Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:42
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Consectetur assumenda in molestiae debitis accusamus quaerat consectetur.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What should I do to stop being angered easily?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sea spiders found farming methane-eating microbes in cultivated biofilm - Phys.org
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Mauricio Pochettino on Absent Christian Pulisic: 'Players Cannot Dictate the Plan' - FOX Sports
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Is it true that sleeping with your hair down can cause damage?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
New COVID variant swiftly gains ground in US; concern looms for summer wave - Ars Technica
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.